블로그 이미지
안녕하세요, 블로그 주인장 Choi PM 입니다. 본 블로그는 제가 정신줄 놓기 전에 제약 PM업무와 관련한 정보와 노하우를 기록해 보고자 만든 공간입니다. 블로그를 통해 제약업계의 여~러분과 좋은 인연되길 바랍니다.^^ flanaria@naver.com Since2007/10/14 Choi PM

카테고리

분류 전체보기 (635)
Private (10)
KNOW_HOW (37)
MUST_KNOW (79)
그냥 아이디어 (13)
나이가 들면서 알게 되는 것들... (9)
지식창고(펌글모음) (417)
주요업무양식 (5)
주요 학회일정 (27)
경쟁사 동향 (37)
Total
Today
Yesterday

GSK America의  MR들이 유럽화되었다...
참 재밌는 제목입니다. 여기서 말하는 유럽화란 처방을 유도하는 능력에 대하여 더 이상 보상하지 않는다는 의미라고 합니다. 그렇다면 뭐에 대하여 보상해야 할까요?
저자는 세가지라고 합니다. 우리의 현실과 한번 비교해 보는 것도 재밌겠네요.
여러분의 회사에서는 혹은 여러분은 MR을 어떻게 평가하고 있습니까?
Product Knowledge, Customer Value, and Business Acumen.


Sunday, January 23, 2011
GSK's U.S. Sales Reps "Europeanized": No Longer Rewarded for Ability to Push Prescriptions
According to the Financial Times, "GlaxoSmithKline will this month scrap payments to its US-based commercial staff based on individual sales targets, as it attempts to draw a line under past aggressive marketing practices that have incurred substantial fines" (see here).

GSK’s sales "reps" will no longer receive commissions "based on their ability to push prescriptions. They will instead be paid based on their scientific knowledge, feedback from customers and the performance of their business unit."

An anonymous poster to CafePharma described what the "new" sales model will look like:


You will be judged on 3 categories. Product Knowledge, Customer Value, and Business Acumen. Each one of these will be split into 2 parts. Preparation and implementation. Basically, 6 categories to be subjectively assigned expertise levels by your manager. Hope you have a good relationship... This is how you will get your "cut" of your region's take of bonus dollars.

Oh yeah... you are also no longer referred to as pharmaceutical sales reps... from now on you are called "Customer Facing Staff". No joke...

GSK recently revealed a $3.5bn charge to settle product liability lawsuits and regulatory fines linked to past sales practices (see story here), which may have prompted this change as well as changes in funding physician continuing medical education (CME): GSK will now restrict funding CME courses to a small number of non-profit institutions.

This seems to be a radical shift in the evolution of the pharma sales model that has been followed by companies like Kantar Health. I've written on this subject in several Pharma Marketing News articles over the past year or so. See this recent article: "The Changing Pharma Commercial Model in 2010 and Beyond" (use discount code '95MDK' to download it free).

I also note that in order for a pharma company to reward its sales reps based on prescription volume of physicians they have detailed (the "old" model), the company has to have access to the prescription writing data of individual physicians. It's not a coincidence perhaps that the Supreme Court will soon determine if states have the right to prevent access to that data by pharma companies (see "Supreme Court to Decide Fate of State Laws that Prohibit Use of Rx Records by Pharma"). GSK may be sensing that the decision will go against them and they can take the "high" voluntary road now instead of taking the "low" legally-forced road tomorrow.

Although this model may be new in the U.S., it's not so new in Europe where pharma companies never had access to individual physician prescribing behavior. In Europe -- as I understand it -- pharma companies can only see how prescriptions change among a block of physicians in a certain geographical area more or less equivalent to a zip code in the U.S. Thus, basing sales rep commissions upon "district" performance in the U.S. is similar to how it's done in the EU. From the anonymous post made to CafePharma cited above, it looks like U.S. reps are not going to be happy to be "Europeanized."

Posted by Choi PM
, |

최근에 달린 댓글

글 보관함